Thread: EVIL Appliances: compact interchangeable objectives

Creating a single topic whenchoosing a device type EVIL: Electronic Viewfinder, InterchangeableLens.

If you need advice, try to defineyour needs before you apply, you will save time.



And finally, this is not abattlefield to defend a particular brand, thank you to remainobjective in your advice.

This is correct as the Four Thirds image, including high isos? I try to inform a friend who is looking for a compact but quality.

I tend to advise him on ricoh GXR which provides 28 and 50 with a sensor and an optional D90 28-300 of compact extreme.

The X100 will be too limited by the 35mm for the souvenir photo (it does not make art but to travel the photo, and memory with good image quality).

The NEX lenses are so big that so take a reflex pentax and pancakes. The Four Thirds advantage is the provision of optical, in particular, for use souvenir photo, zoom.

The author of the first post should be updated to reference with a brief overview of the major models of the market, as so does the masterful author of the topic, for example MF.

I could just have on hand the latest models and GF3 NEX C3 (but not so lit). I guess at the level grip, it will be somewhat the same between one and NEX-5 GF2. And so, the GF, with the pancake, it is clear that pokey, that's cool.

Then with the 14-42, the size did not shocked. While on the NEX, the 18-55, it completely unbalanced apn.

The olympus is thicker so, stabilizing forces. stabilizer on the pancake is not really necessary, a subject not be fixed in any case unclear if the speed is low. To find out if the 20mm is right for you is simple, force you to use your existing phone @ 40mm in any situation, you will see if it is so disabling that.

By cons I do not see GF3 kit with 20mm (and it seems that protrudes from the casing, which prevents the screw on one foot). I can not find the balance with the nex 18-55, which is very light. The difference in quality is at the sensor between the 16MP APS-C and the nex 12mp μ4 / 3 of Pan, and said sensor said big big goal.

It was obvious but I did not even think So yes I'll see what happens already at 40mm for the NEX, my wife, who also took over it was not hampered by the NEX. it has to come from me. Yes regardless of the model, I do not see a kit with the 20.

So I prefer the 14-42 kit with the 14. I'll try, but there like that, a fixed focal length of 20 seems more usable than 14. Especially when I go back to the portrait. Otherwise between the E-PL2 and GF2, I see that the critics often promote olymp. And almost the most fun would GF1 GF2 in the value for money.

I toured this aprem in another store where there were showcased the NEX, the olymp E-PL1, and especially the GF2 demo. Side window, I eliminate the nex really, because I'm exaggerating a little but frankly, both have a reflex level space. It bothers me a bit.

The Olymp, there was the E-PL1, and I think it's already not very good (but the two pictures of me seems a bit better). But above all it is very clumsy! Then I tested the GF2. I quickly familiar with the menus and touch screen (although I rafolle not). The presence of the dial to set the open and speed are practices (like my G12 of the shot).

I do not know if the difference is obvious, but € 100 for a treatment difference is price to pay jpeg. The nex3 is the smallest of the three, all sizes combined, the goal is a little big but it is especially the aspect that gives this impression, it does not change much in overall size compared to 14-42 in pana. In my opinion if you go to zoom the best q / p is the nex3, less that a GF2.

In two cases the stabilization is built into the lens. Basically the GF2 you have a touch screen, a faster AF, better goal (+ park more scalable).

As I could take a personal EVIL to travel light while maintaining good image quality if the camera / brand / range allows the following:
- sensor having the qualities of the latest Sony APS-C,
- to mount a TGA fixed or zoom on the case (in 21mm eq 24x36 is a maximum), while allowing to mount filters;
- a real shoe to put radio triggers type cactus
- a swivel screen enough to see the screen while making a short self-portraits (and TGA Doncque if you followed). Apart from that, I will be faithful to the reflexes.

EVIL me interest me with the following criteria: - EVF quality built into the case - compact dedicated objectives: at least one wide-angle pancake f / 2 or f/2.8, and a small TV f/1.8 or f / 2 - a dust Possible solutions: - Based on Nex: goals too big, or not dedicated.

And yet housing with viewfinder - based NX: no small TV, and 85 ahead is long focal length (and perhaps cumbersome) - Based on m4 / 3 not seen small TV bright, and I fear a little small sensor on the issues of PDC Maybe if the viewfinder of Nex 7 is really a map in hand, in combo with the Voigtlander 20-40-58 it could do. But I guess you lose the automatic exposure?