Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: The Nice Canon PowerShot SX200 compact Camera

  1. #1
    robert546's Avatar
    robert546 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1
    Ranking
    0

    Default The Nice Canon PowerShot SX200 compact Camera


    Have an off-camera sometimes does not mean we should or mojarla us or take it to the beach without fear. The Canon Powershot SX200 falls into that category for giving, in a fairly compact body, a zoom of 12 and increases the possibility of recording video at 720p, this PMA 2009 will be the detection of smiles was to issue last year.

    If any other compact camera with a chance of becoming head camera unless I missed taking photos in RAW format, with this model of Canon PowerShot will not have that problem. In addition, you can take while jpg files, so we gain flexibility.


    Name:  The Nice Canon PowerShot SX200 compact Camera.jpg
Views: 279
Size:  43.8 KB


    Guess that the sensor takes the Canon Powershot SX200 IS? You were right, a 12-megapixel CCD. Add an angle of 28 mm and 3-inch LCD screen and complete specifications quite acceptable to put on a par with most of its rivals in the market for very compact ultrazoom.

    The HDMI port, one that brings the elements of fashion this year 2009, not lack either. With it, we can connect the camera to the TV in a very comfortable and effective in showing both the 12-megapixel images and videos in high definition.

  2. #2
    robin987's Avatar
    robin987 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    205
    Ranking
    4

    Default

    If these benefits come from an unknown brand would think, "That bodrio" ... but being from Canon, I think just the opposite, put a 12X in a body so small is a feat, since I saw him in a Lumix with 10X (which is not bad), you only have to know the quality and the optical stabilizer, but by less than 300 €, can be a "Top Sales" and a tough rival for the competition.

  3. #3
    Jacob456's Avatar
    Jacob456 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    290
    Ranking
    4

    Default

    In my view the only thing it lacks is GPS.alguien know where to find more information?

  4. #4
    ADAN's Avatar
    ADAN is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    239
    Ranking
    4

    Default

    And I'm also looking for a Canon camera with gps, but no profit.

  5. #5
    KAIF's Avatar
    KAIF is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    172
    Ranking
    4

    Default

    Very good option, any date for availability has been rumored that at least?

  6. #6
    robin987's Avatar
    robin987 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    205
    Ranking
    4

    Default

    As for cameras, I do not know of any, at least this type of compact range, it is curious, although I have a Kodak for more than 7 years as an accessory that had GPS, but of course, not being a trend was quite expensive and hard to find.

  7. #7
    sikkim23's Avatar
    sikkim23 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    84
    Ranking
    4

    Default

    The camera XD GPS guess because if any.

  8. #8
    batista142's Avatar
    batista142 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    81
    Ranking
    4

    Default

    Too bad sensor on it since (CCD 1/2.3 "). It is so blind that a bullet ...

    It is better for the new Canon PowerShot SD 990 IS. (CCD 1/1.7 "and 14.7Mpíxeles) Less zoom, but at least leave some image.

  9. #9
    randy258's Avatar
    randy258 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    193
    Ranking
    4

    Default

    The luminosity of the lens and leaves much to be desired: F3.4-5.3

    That means that from 6x zoom, auto focus will make the "look" like a fool in scenes with light or dim interior, and seconds will be good to make a picture.

    What we need is more size and less-megapixel sensor.
    Last edited by randy258; 02-28-2009 at 03:54 PM.

  10. #10
    singh147's Avatar
    singh147 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    176
    Ranking
    4

    Default

    Hello everybody,


    I cannot see the raw, at least from what I read there. Can you confirm?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SEO by SubmitEdge
SEO by SubmitEdge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312