Thread: Technology and energy saving new Panasonic Viera G10 plasma TV

Panasonic does not abandon the plasma technology and is one of the few that still capture the same. A clear example is the presentation in Spain of its new Viera TVs G10, where special attention has been paid to improving the moving image and color reproduction. For this premiere NeoPDP technology, which reduces consumption by an estimated 40% over previous models of the brand.

Panasonic Viera TVs G10 have moved to improve the panel to develop new phosphors and cell wider to improve discharge and reduce the minimum excitation which acts as a pilot power of cells and thus a reduction of energy.





Turning to more television series debuts G10 also the Sub-field Drive Intelligent Frame Creation Pro 600 Hz, which enhances the image when the scene is very moving. So if you penalize the strength of the plasma technology, the high contrast, which in this case is 40.000:1 native to 2.000.000:1 dynamic.

It was time to go to implement high-definition tuners in new televisions. Price does not know anything?

but in the EU would not prohibit the marketing of the plasma in the near future?

chungoboy: But you were the LCD of the last century!, technology derived directly from the solar calculators that we all had .. :-) And contrast and response time will never come andalusia by definition plasma technology

I bet that 42 "is on the range € 1000-1200 PZ today.

VALT: the EU is that what he said was going to ask that the below electrodmésticos consume energy X 2010. The data on the EU are looking for plasmas ¡¡¡5 YEARS AGO! I bet that the news was "caused" by some manufacturers of LCD. The current plasmas consume much less than 5 years ago and insurance for 2010 yet consuming less.

According lei por ahi if you do the calculations on a FULL HD 42 "about the annual savings with an LCD vs plasma was approximately € 5 ..

clear, leaving garbage from LCD ... that there is more profit margin. ... ke to see there FORZA PLASMA!.

A screen with 100% fidelity in the reproduction of content regardless of whether it is 24Hz, 50Hz or 60Hz.

I hope that soon the 600Hz is available to everyone.

Surely if it was a "half-truths" of which are only interested in selling lcd.

I got it clear, once a new TV in my house is going to be plasma. As if I have to bring the black market. Do not give up the best technology that exists through 4 tough save on electricity.

me and my ignorance, I wonder, are they required 600 seconds for refresh? But the human eye does not see more than 25-30 fps, no?

I understand that a screen at 100 Hz provides better quality than a 50 Hz, but are necessary to that 600Hz refresh rate?

I think, in my humble opinion, that if you diminish the frequency and decrease the heat consumption without losing quality.