Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: N.Y. AG accuses Intel of antitrust violations

  1. #11
    Incendio Corte's Avatar
    Incendio Corte is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    84
    Ranking
    3

    Default


    Those are really things that have never been recognized though. You are taking the EU extortion commission as some type of indicator to how the result will be in the states. I think years from now when this really goes to trial, most asserts will be quite watered down when real proof is required. I acquire yes although. IF the claims are as fierce as AMD claims or their shill Charlie D claim, then it is devious. My guess is truth will fall anywhere in between though.

  2. #12
    Zanetta Natal's Avatar
    Zanetta Natal is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    102
    Ranking
    3

    Default

    Really, I was thoughts of Japan, or how lots of do we require? And how many reasons will we see? This goes exact to my point about Intel’s IGPs. Intel isn’t ideal. Like Elmo said, it just doesn’t substance about AMD, except any proof they can bring in. It’s all concerning Intel and their behavior. Everyone wants to impression their fan hats and seek a better direction, counting Intel.

  3. #13
    Honorato Idurre's Avatar
    Honorato Idurre is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    80
    Ranking
    3

    Default

    This guy doesn't dress in a fan hat . These guy sols his i7 rig and reserved his P2 rig because it was the improved gamer. These claims are unpolluted ridiculous though. Excuses for uselessness at the time the way I observe it.

  4. #14
    Zanetta Natal's Avatar
    Zanetta Natal is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    102
    Ranking
    3

    Default

    That’s your view and good for you. But, laws live and will carry on to a lot longer than we have time here on earth. So, we stand for the law. If trying to make it playful is the point though, I’m not trade. Who knows how terrible, how much may have changed etc, and if Intel hadn’t been called out, how awful it would be now yet?

    One could say, oh it was only this occasion, or this sum of time, or, they couldn’t or wouldn’t do that now, but again, that’s estimation here, not really known.
    Talk to a good lawyer (yes, there are a few).

    They’ll inform you they’ll try to look for impartiality, no matter what, even if there is no definite justice. Thos definitions exist in our laws and once more, we stand for them and if busted, we break more than just the law itself, but work away at foundations place long ago, foundations locate for the betterment of everyone.

  5. #15
    Florita Garbin's Avatar
    Florita Garbin is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    79
    Ranking
    3

    Default

    Allow me add. The creation was improved (AMD), but everything about the product could have been done enhanced. Advertising, supply channels, partnerships, presence with OEMS. Some of those could be pretentious if Intel did leave as low as maintained and other things were convenient. Tough to say this many years later though.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SEO by SubmitEdge
SEO by SubmitEdge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89